The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 03:42, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rootflage[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any reliable sources about this seemingly non-notable product/neologism (stated to be slang, but can only find references to the product with this name online). – 296.x (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Well, "Wikipedia is not a dictionary" and this is purely a slang term, non-notable neologism. Its only hits are for a company by the same name, which makes this promotional as well. czar · · 02:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:28, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Czar: promotional dictionary entry. Ignatz mice•talk 02:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.