The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Bobet 18:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnie Chopra[edit]

non notable person. no sources. could not verify his stated television apppearances. only article by creator. vanity article C5mjohn 14:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, provisionally. Person is obviously notable IF he's a regular commentator on television. Article just need it sources listed, and a thorough chainsawing to eliminate the fluffery. Before any editor posts "delete", they should consider taking this task up.--Mike18xx 08:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, if you need verification you can look on the www.bastioncapital.co.uk web page, look under the newsroom section and then click on media, Some of the clips of Ronnie Chopra on TV can be found there. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.82.81.179 (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 21:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no sources, nothing in Google News Archive either. NN talking head. --Dhartung | Talk 22:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Dhartung; non-notable person. Bigdaddy1981 22:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Modify per Mike18xx. If one is not lazy and uses something other than Google for their source of nourishment (as if Google holds all the knowledge of mankind) it's pretty evident going to www.bastioncapital.co.uk and scanning the video archives that this bloke has indeed done a few notable things. I suggest someone editing the article to clean it up a bit, but to say the guy is NN is ridiculous. Seems a lot of Wikipedians are themselves people who will never, ever amount to anything at all, and therefore have a grudge against those who are out in the real world, slugging it away and doing something. I suppose if I were a computer programmer, sitting in a dark room and getting my nourishment from Digg.com, I'd be a pretty sad bastard hating MySpace bands, up-and-coming actors, and other sorts of REAL PEOPLE who are out there doing something constructive, instead of wanking-off in front of Wikipedia. Oh, and let us not forget your "esteemed professor" who turned-out to be no more than some bollocks git from Kentucky. Hail Wikipedia! Nightlink 21:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced possible vanity 65.241.15.131 21:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an unsourced biog of a non notable. If evidence is provided of notability I will reconsider. Nuttah68 12:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep! I am quite new to this so please accept my apologies if I get the format wrong, just a quick note regarding guy, I have seen him on TV. Have also seen some of his articles somewhere. I travel to London now and then and do remember seeing this guy on Sky News. All the Best. Brian Walters btw68@yahoo.co.uk

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.