The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 20:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Link (entertainer)[edit]

Ron Link (entertainer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Entertainer is not notable (tagged since April 2008) Sebastian scha. (talk) 01:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- I don't particularly care about this person but I do think he is notable. I just added a few references showing that he has been featured multiple times in notable television and stage performances. He has been the subject of multiple independent sources. The article should be re-written though to sound more encyclopedic.Nrswanson (talk) 01:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Also the Nashuatec Musical Award is a pretty big deal in the Netherlands as it is that country's equivalent to the Grammy Awards.Nrswanson (talk) 06:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've got some problems with this 'sources', The homepage of the employee and the hompage of the art work (musical) of the employee are not secondary sources (but this is not the place to discuss sources). I'll say that Link is maybe notable if there is a newspaper or any other secondary source. You're right, Nrswanson, concerning the notability guidelines for performer, Link might be notable if sourced. Thank you Sebastian scha. (talk) 13:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.