The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 05:35, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian Consulate General, Cahul[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

yes the Romanian president has visited this but fails WP:ORG., consulates are lower on the rung than embassies which aren't inherently notable.

Romanian Consulate General, Bălți
Romanian Consulate General, Zaječar LibStar (talk) 06:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 February 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I have to agree with the decision to delete this article. It is insufficiently covered. The coverage it receives in cited sources are mostly about the establishment of the consulate. Meşteşugarul - U 22:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - small consulates are not notable, per past outcomes. Bearian (talk) 23:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.