The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 15:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - while this article is only a stub, the nominator has made no case for its deletion. Please make reference to established grounds for deletion. Your opinion that it is not notable is insufficient. Ground Zero | t 05:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is no reason for deletion of this article, expansion is what is needed. This transit advocacy group is quite influential and has helped to shape reports by the TTC 99.232.51.39 (talk) 07:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I do agree that the article needs expansion now, since when I had nominated the article for deletion, I had no idea why was the article there in the first place. It may have been just like many other non-notable transit advocacy group in Toronto when I first stumbled upon this article. Johnny Au (talk) 18:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In other notes, this article is orphaned, since the only mainspace link to this article is 501 Queen (TTC). Johnny Au (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep De-orphaning and expansion are what's needed, as they are clearly notable. --Pwnage8 (talk) 19:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.