The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:31, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RocketLoans[edit]

RocketLoans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply nothing at all for actual independent notability and substance given the sheer fact that (regardless of publication or name) the listed sources are still in fact simply business announcements, interviews, mentions and notices and it's damning enough this was speedied once before until being restarted by the same account, which I presume is a company employee or affiliate, as no one would ever care to restart such advertising. We have explicit policies about this and they especially exist for such clear advertising, and since searches found nothing but mirorred PR, that says enough. SwisterTwister talk 15:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. per nom. I am unable to find any reliable sources that demonstrate notability. Cyali (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Quicken Loans. This is appears to be part of the Quicken Loans family of companies. The parent is definitely notable, as are some of its sibling companies. But this one hasn't independently achieved notability. It may in the future given the aggressive tactics of the Quicken Loans family (such as Super Bowl ads) but right now it's WP:TOO SOON.49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- a promotional article on an unremarkable company. I don't see a reason to merge as the content is strictly promotional. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.