The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Proudfoot[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable former junior hockey player. Non-notable to the point of bordering on an A7 speedy deletion. BLPProd removed based on the presence of an external link ref to a stats site, and regular Prod removed for, well, no real reason. Reso lute 15:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable player who does not meet notability requirements. BLP prod removed for valid reason. However, the regular prod was removed stating that I can't re-add it after a blp prod was removed however that is incorrect as it is explicitly laid out that you can do so at Wikipedia:Prod#Sticky prod. And I quote "This does not affect the regular prod process, which may still be used on BLPs, including BLPs from which the sticky prod has been legitimately removed." If the remover would have taken the time to actually read the prod and the linked article he would have known that. Instead he seems to treat everything on the wiki as a battleground. -DJSasso (talk) 16:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. —DJSasso (talk) 16:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable player who does not meet any notability requirements.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dawson City Beatdown Delete: Short of outright hoaxes or NFTs, this may be the least significant subject I've ever seen at AfD. I don't much blame the inexperienced editor who created the article, but the prod removal is just this side of bad faith and WP:POINT violation. Utter and complete GNG and W:NHOCKEY failure. Ravenswing 19:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as player doesn't meet notability requirements. GoodDay (talk) 21:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Anyone want to have a snowball fight? Fails each and every possible standard of notability. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 22:59, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable Jr A player. Bhockey10 (talk) 06:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.