The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rights Lab[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a web series, which makes no strong claim of notability per WP:NMEDIA and is sourced only to its own creators' own self-published content about it with no indication of reliable source coverage. As always, Wikipedia is not a public relations directory on which all web series automatically get to have articles -- real media coverage, supporting a real claim of notability (which is not the same thing as existence) must be present. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:29, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 10:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 10:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:30, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as too soon at best, none of this suggests better satisfying the applicable notability. Draft and Userfy only if needed. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:TOOSOON, but definitely a fascinating topic. I think this has promise in the future, just not now. Chrisw80 (talk) 05:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.