The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, the consensus is that the article fails WP:N.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Richa Tiwari[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created by a sock puppet. I've blocked the sock. It has been edited by IPs, most of whom, if not all, are the same person as the sock account. Almost nothing in the article is true, and with the exception of the Facebook reference, none of the sources supports the material. Then, of course, there are the citation needed tags, which obviously don't belong in a "new" article (it has been recreated many times in the past). I have semi-protected the page because of the IP socks.

I have left in the garbage so editors can see it. I've resisted deleting the article because of my involvement and on the off chance that the person satisfies our notability guidelines.

The two sources. The first does not mention the subject's name. The second is a Wikipedia clone of another article, and the parenthetical about the subject is NOT even in the article anymore. Don't know when and if it was.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:43, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:V and WP:BIO. CutestPenguin ^discuss 14:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete if indeed created by a blocked user. Otherwise delete per nominator's rationale. Quis separabit? 18:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If it had been created by a known sock at the time of creation, I would have speedy deleted it myself. WP:CSD#G5 doesn't apply in this instance.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Bbb23 and CutestPenguin. Searched using English language newspapers in India, plus several SERPs, plus browsed the references, not much to indicate notability.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 19:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article is an obvious DELETE. Fails WP:RS WP:V WP:GNG. It probably should have been Speedy Deleted as db-spam or db-A7. --Jersey92 (talk) 23:36, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete I think it shouldn't be deleted being a huge fan of Kalakarz I know Richa Tiwari. I am not allowed to edit it as it is semi-protected but I've requested wiki to let me edit it .I've some good information and references between the user is blocked and had used many IPs so it is his fault not of richa tiwari why is the article even considered for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamlolloliam (talk • contribs) 19:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Please provide links here on this page, but you might wish to read this first.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly fails WP:BIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.