The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 19:02, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rheinair[edit]

Rheinair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any references that this company is an airline at all. Judging from its website, it's rather a travel agency or even only a booking platform. Anyway, as there are no reliable third-party sources to be found on the internet that offer a deeper coverage, Rheinair clearly fails notability per WP:CORP. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:20, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable. There is nothing in the article (a miniscule stub) to indicate notability, and as Gene93 noted, it doesn't even appear to be an airline. From the website it looks more like a ticketing agency. --MelanieN (talk) 02:08, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.