The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. jj137 ^♠ 03:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse antisemitism[edit]

Unsourced OR with an attempt at prophesying as well. A PROD tag was inserted only minutes after this article was created, but was quickly removed. There was no follow-up on the newpage patrol's part, but no attempt to address the issues of this article either. The author himself seems to have abandoned this article. Delete. Blanchardb-^{MeMyEarsMyMouth}-timed 01:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Censor We can't let something this explosive get out. Think of the children! - Richfife (talk) 02:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The few google hits I get seem to be spur of the moment inventions of the phrase. I think myself, and most other people, would appreciate some academic attention on overreactive media accusations of antisemitism, before a Wikipedia article is created to push POV. --Nick Penguin_(contribs) 02:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although something of this sort is observable (watch what happens when you comment on a Wikipedia article with the word "Jewish" in it), this article has zero sources. It's just some goy kvetching, what a schmendrick. Mandsford (talk) 02:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research and unverifiable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. OR, POV, unsourced, potential neologism, and the list goes on ... --Paularblaster (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've searched for sources and there is nothing in the article and not much more elsewhere, that would constitute a reliable source to support the terminology. Alansohn (talk) 08:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Rubbish. Nick mallory (talk) 08:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Rewrite - the content is fact for all I care, and a bit of research will certainly find sources, though the exact terminology might differ. Maybe my opinion is coloured by the fact that I'm a German and the meme is even stronger over here, where in some circles you can't say anything against modern-day Israel without being labeled a Nazi. --Arcanios (talk) 09:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jewish lobby. Race card also seems relevant. Colonel Warden (talk) 11:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to race card, then add a line to that article mentioning that the "Jewish lobby" sometimes tries to play it. This phenomenon exists (in the UK particularly against those who support Palestinian "resistance") and there are ghits for the term, but it's clumsy and "race card" sums up the concept better. Needless to say the text of this article is weaselly nonsense and should be killed with fire. Moyabrit (talk) 19:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Poorly written original research.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 16:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or userfy. Obvious POV essay which is inappropriate in article space. *** Crotalus *** 22:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfying would be pointless given that the article was created by a single-purpose account that has been inactive for more than four months. --Blanchardb-^{MeMyEarsMyMouth}-timed 23:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Throw to the wolves since we cannot allow the truth to come out. <eleland/talkedits> 19:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Rewrite. The term seems to be used in academia, examples are [1] and [2] (if you Google, the term appears). It is also used in the Jewish Tribune, Canada’s largest Jewish weekly newspaper (see: [3]). But it needs to be referenced and treated carefully. - Mafia Expert (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.