The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RetroGuide[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:COI promotion of an academic (software, it seems) project. All sources are fairly recent wp:primary publications and their first author also wrote this Wikipedia page as well as healthcare workflow and made some edits to the SPA-written HealthFlow. Someone not using his real name (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They wrote a lot of papers about this, but a Google Scholar search for the first author's name finds that all papers have less than 20 citations each, and most have single-digit citations, suggesting lack of wp:notability. Someone not using his real name (talk) 15:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.