The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Speedy deletion already said. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retardomusic[edit]

Retardomusic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete irrelevant internet meme. It receives a grand total of six unique hits via google search, four of which are related to this Wikipedia article. There are about 2000 non-unique hits, all of them from the site rantsnraves.org. Fails WP:WEB. Mindmatrix 14:41, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable, seems like self promotion and/or a joke. Northwestgnome (talk) 14:51, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete made up neologism, joke, personal essay, possible attack magnet and I could go on and on... Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete fails WP:N, WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:RS and WP:NFT. Delete it please, horrible. --Numyht (talk) 17:01, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - as an nn meme and probable OR. May actually qualify as a speedy --T-rex 17:26, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete, possibly speedy as an obvious attempt to astroturf a patently non-notable meme/advertise a website. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Super Strong Speedy Delete - Speedy under CSD A7 as a non-notable meme, from a non-notable website. Complete original research. Total violations of WP:NFT, WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:NEO, and WP:WEB. How many policies can one article break? Speedy Delete. iced kola^(Mmm...) 01:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete, for the same reasons everybody else mentioned. BecauseWhy? (talk) 01:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete complete and total worthless garbage from an idiot troll trying to force a meme. If he kicks up a fuss, block him. JuJube (talk) 02:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I think this entry will do no harm. It is a genuine development in trolling and I see no reason why it needs to be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueskyboris (talk • contribs) 02:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please read WP:NOHARM. Mindmatrix 02:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.