The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion is not present. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Renewable energy in Oceania[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No useful information, and no real content added since 2015, when the article was created. Yann (talk) 19:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:03, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:03, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak, provisional~~ keep. There seems to be a reasonable amount of information floating around in various places, and I've added the Australia article. I'm going to see if I can put something together. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - there is no valid reason given to delete, and there are reliable sources therein. Bearian (talk) 01:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.