The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. While there are three people advocating Keep, one is basing it on a gut feeling and another is simply calling it "interesting". The lack of sources (and the fact that the Book of Michael appears to be unpublished) seals the deal. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:24, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reform Mormonism[edit]

Reform Mormonism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Zero reliable sources to substantiate notability. I've checked Google Books, Google Scholar, and Google News and can't find anything to justify this article. PubliusFL 17:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, fails WP:ORG. --Dhartung | Talk 17:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, more blatant: fails WP:V Alf photoman 20:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I am sure it is notable; I just don't have any proof that it is.--Sefringle 06:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and there is where the problem is... we can't prove it Alf photoman 13:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as an apostasty of the LDS. WP:RS is relative to the nature of the subject. This is not only a New religious movement, the book the religion is based on is in popular culture. Wikipedia precedent and policy has shown that it is permitted to report the self-description of groups, as self-descriptions, reserving due weight considerations of the notability of the group/site/author within the article's subject. - WeniWidiWiki 18:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I may have missed something -- what book? PubliusFL 19:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Wikipedia is not a web directory. This religion is just a website at this point. Does not appear notable, not even as an LDS offshoot. If this changes in the future and they become a notable movement an article would be justified. Dragomiloff 01:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is an interesting and important development within a major religion. It's small and recent, yes, but still notable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.107.129.107 (talk • contribs) 14:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete The book is [The Book of Michael which has apparently never been printed. A quick google search shows a network of websites and a few blogs before descending into irrelevant hits. Right now there are no independent sources and the evidence is that this is simply a very small part of the Latter Day Saint movement and the mention on that page is sufficient. Just include the external link as a reference. Eluchil404 10:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.