The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RedPoint Global[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable--no actual prizes, jus tmentions along with many other companies. No references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements DGG ( talk ) 05:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with DGG: Where's the beef? ☆ Bri (talk) 16:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as corporate spam with no indications of notability or significance. Includes promo language such as "...has been recognized by Forrester as a leader in cross-channel campaign management!" etc. Borders on G11. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.