The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 12:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ReMix[edit]

ReMix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

A neologism (or perhaps a neocapitalisation, as a remix (note caps) is notable), as described by OverClocked ReMix#Purpose, it's apparrently been created by the creator of a (notable) website to justify a percieved discord between the website's name and it's purpose. It's basically a non-notable apart perhaps from a single sentence explanation that already exists in the main OC Remix article. FredOrAlive 00:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a neologism and redirect to remix either remix or OverClocked ReMix (I'll leave it up to the closing admin). --Coredesat 00:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment is a redirect actually needed? A random test seems to show that the other random capitalisations of Remix (bar the all caps REMIX, which goes to an Indian drama series) are automatically redirected to Remix, although someone who knows more about MediaWiki can proably say for certain if a redirect is needed or better for server load. FredOrAlive 01:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is a neologism, and seems to be just self-promotion for the website. Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 02:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - it's pretty much admitted to be a neologism in the article. --Haemo 03:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and redirect to OverClocked ReMix or remix. Preferably to OverClocked ReMix, but it doesn't really matter. --- RockMFR 03:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Neologlism. Realkyhick 03:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. —dima/s-ko/ 04:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Causesobad → (Talk) 03:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.