The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 16:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Raozan Darul Islam Kamil (M.A) Madrasah[edit]

Raozan Darul Islam Kamil (M.A) Madrasah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG already draftified as WP:ATD as not being ready for mainspace but article creator has recreated article so no choice but to delete now. Dom from Paris (talk) 12:02, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's not a bio but it is so poorly written and sourced that it could be about anything really. it is a Madrasa or school in fact. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:12, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:19, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:19, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:19, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your insights. I'm sticking with Delete for now as it appears to still be a Fazil according to the government website [2] and the official self-pub website provided [3]. Then you can create redirects for Raozan Darul Islam Fazil Madrasah and Raujan Darul Islam Fazil Madrasah to go to Raozan Upazila#Madrasah If it got upgraded to Kamil recently then we need a source as well as an update from the government website to make that official. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This helps, but I agree with AngusWOOF that at this time it remains a delete. I'll reconsider if a reliable source can be found for the Kamil claim. Jack N. Stock (talk) 18:09, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.