![]() | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 July 10. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was Delete early per WP:SNOW, the fact that the only "keep" votes are from single purpose accounts that appear to be sockpuppets, and the request of the subject of the article. Risker (talk) 16:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created by COI editor User:Cjas now blocked and edited by three other editors, one of whom User:MisterMeth has admitted that all four editors shared the same computer facilities and are suspected of being sock or meat puppets, cf. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MisterMeth. The article is not referenced by WP:RS and I can find no references establishing notability apart from his authoring 2 books and a dissertation [1]. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In response to the points rasied by CommCorr
To reiterate this article lacks the evidence to show that the subject is notable and/or the independent sources to back up that viewpoint and as such should be deleted
As an addendum, I see CommCorr has nominated this article for GA status. If I were the reviewer it would be auto fail not only for lack of notability but for it's very poor standard of writing and failure to adhere to WP:MOSBIO. NtheP (talk) 23:03, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Have fun emailing the Wikimedia Foundation, and in the meantime, we'll be deleting the page.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 00:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]