The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ram Iyer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet the guidelines in WP:NAUTHOR. The author's three books are self-published through BookSurge and don't seem to have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many National Geographic Bee competitors have used these publications to advance to the top levels of the competition LuckyWiki26 17:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the very positive reviews from top National Geographic Bee contestants in the back of Mr. Iyer's books. Tathagat Bhatia (Captain of the Third-place-winning team at the National Geographic World Championship 2013), Sanjeev (Ricky) Uppaluri (2013 3rd-place Winner), Vansh Jain (2011 2nd-place Winner), Arjun Kandaswamy (2009 2nd-place Winner), National-level Top-ten finalists including Anthony Cheng, Zaroug Jaleel, Milan Sandhu, and Nikhil Desai have all praised Mr. Iyer's books, crediting these publications with their Geo Bee success. LuckyWiki26 18:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm just not finding anything that would support WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. The article is sourced only to the author's website and an article about his son, and in a search I don't see any significant coverage of the subject. I found only one full-length review of any of the books, and that was on a blog. Worldcat shows several editions of his books, none held in more than a small handful of libraries. User reviews don't help with a subject's notability. EricEnfermero (Talk) 06:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GNG and AUTHOR fail. Confidence on the part of the article author is a nice feature, but so would the author getting to know the Notability policies of Wikipedia.L3X1 My Complaint Desk 17:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: In the article, I have added some sources and additional information that is relevant to this discussion. CaspianX (talk) 19:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reviews on Amazon and Goodreads are user-generated content, and don't help to confer notability. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as I agree with nom and EricEnfermero that this specific "Ram Iyer" does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR (a Google search shows at least one other Ram Iyer, a professor at TTU, whose claim to notability would be much stronger than the subject of this Article). @L3X1: there is probably no need to Userfy, as a duplicate exists at User:LuckyWiki26/sandbox/Ram Iyer.--talk2Chun^{(talk) (contributions)} 20:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk2chun Ok. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 20:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.