The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:32, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - according to my standards, this fails, but it CLAIMS to be over 100 years old. What do others think? Bearian (talk) 21:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Age, size, revenue are all unimportant in and of themselves when assessing notability, the question is has this firm revived the significant coverage in RS's and my searching indicates no, it looks like a run of the mill local law firm, nothing special, they exist in every major town all over the world. Mtking (edits) 22:01, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.