The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Please defer merge related discussion to article talk. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rabbitmon[edit]

Rabbitmon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete because this fictional character fails WP:N which says “A topic is notable if it has been the subject of at least one substantial or multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject and of each other.” The article is mostly in-universe and consists of original research, violating WP:OR. Inkpaduta 15:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge All -mon articles are currently undergoing a mass-merger, this is stated in the talk page. Nightmare SE 16:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Let this page stay! This would be a good reference to this Digimon. Outside of that, this mass merge is ridiculous! Rtkat3 (talk) 5:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge per Wikipedia:WikiProject Digimon Systems Update/Article reorganization. Not ridiculous. Punkmorten 22:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:NOT#PAPER, appears to be a notable Pokemon. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 18:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - let the dust settle on the digimon reorginization. - Peregrine Fisher 18:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.