The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RAMP[edit]

RAMP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Again, another page marked for speedy deletion that has plenty of assertion of notability but no sources backing it up so far. This band is notable if there are sources to back up the stuff in the article; are there such sources? Again I have no opinion. Grandmasterka 07:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. AllMusic pretty much confirms artist's notability. The article just needs to be sourced. ObtuseAngle 19:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete, so something confirms notability, but I see no reference of it in the article Alf^Photoman 20:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - lack of referencing means it should be tagged for addiitonal referencing and not deletion. Based on the allmusic entry, this is likely to be notable, and sourceable. -- Whpq 05:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Quick look round the Internet confirms notablity under WP:Band but the artcile needs to be properly sourced. A1octopus 19:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A quick look finds no references for anything in this article. As per policy WP:A, If an article topic has no reliable sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. Alan.ca 06:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 13:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or (less ideally) Merge into Roy Ayers. Added a Yahoo link.--Hobit 17:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, but someone really needs to show this article what thumbnails are. Black-Velvet 08:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.