The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cryptocurrency#Criticism as a viable ATD. While the history is under the redirect, I caution a merge without establishing consensus as there's no support for it at this discussion Star Mississippi 16:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

R/Buttcoin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two-sentence stub about a subreddit that is not in any way notable. 162 etc. (talk) 01:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A joke stretched too thin to be an article. BD2412 T 03:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Websites. DreamRimmer (talk) 04:57, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No content, no notability. This wouldn't fit in any other article, much less stand on its own. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 07:06, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The amount of content is not relevant. WP:PERMASTUB articles can meet the WP:GNG. PhotographyEdits (talk) 20:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A permastub ultimately has finished information about a topic, even if there isn't much. "This is a subreddit which does X" doesn't prove notability or coverage, which a small time actor (for example) may have. TheInsatiableOne (talk) 07:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Albeit currently a short article, there has been sustained coverage for meeting the WP:GNG. Also, consider WP:ATD. PhotographyEdits (talk) 09:55, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is currently not notable enough for Wikipedia article (talk) 20:13, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Based on what Wikipedia policy or guideline would it not be notable enough? Also, please sign your message. PhotographyEdits (talk) 20:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry my bad based on WP:NWEB 1keyhole (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Barely any relevancy or notability and I don't think there's any improvements to be made. Dawnbails (talk) 22:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment So far nobody has suggested a merge, which should be done if feasible according to policy. I think that if this article cannot be kept, this subreddit could be summarized in a single sentence at Cryptocurrency#Criticism. I really don't see a good reason for deletion. PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:25, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.