The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mixed-breed dog. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quiltro[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quiltro is a term used to describe a mixed-breed dog in Chile and Bolivia, and the article is just a definition and list of trivia. I've already added mention of this term to the article mixed-breed dog. It should be noted that "quiltro" is a redirect to "mixed-breed dog" on the Spanish Wikipedia -- if they're not keeping a standalone page about it, even though the countries in question would fall under their scope, it makes very little sense for us to do so. Even if that's not a reason to change it to a redirect on this project, it's worth thinking about.

If this was a specific type of mix, a la potcake dog or sato, I wouldn't be nominating it; however, many countries have their own terms for the generic mixed-breed dog and they don't all need separate pages. Anna ^talk 01:35, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I created the article when there was content on the word and it was called Quiltro (it has since been moved to Perro mestizo), from a version like this. Move whatever necessary to Mixed breed dog, and redirect. -- Diego talk 01:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per policy. LiteralKa (talk) 01:43, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, it's you and your wikilawyering. Diego talk 02:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I would caution you to be civil. LiteralKa (talk) 02:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - LOL, how can that be uncivil? Diego talk 02:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - Well for one, I didn't say it wasn't. It is, however, the type of comment that eventually degrades into incivility. Second, you immediately assumed bad faith. Third, citing policy is not "utilizing the rules in a manner contrary to their principles." LiteralKa (talk) 02:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        I've no interest in involving myself in an useless discussion with you. kthxbai. Diego talk 02:24, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        Since when is calling anything wikilawyering not bad faith? LiteralKa (talk) 02:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect (Note: changed my vote from deletion) Simply a dictionary definition. snaphat (talk) 02:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. — --Darkwind (talk) 04:46, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — --Darkwind (talk) 04:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mixed-breed dog; otherwise delete per WP:DICDEF and WP:RS. Richwales (talk · contribs) 05:27, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect term to Mixed-breed dog; recreate it as a Wiktionary entry. It is a decent definition of a common Chilean term, in my opinion. Gosgood (talk) 20:42, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mixed-breed dog. That is the concept at issue; we don't do articles for synonyms, per Not a dictionary. Cnilep (talk) 01:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
DICDEF, merge and redirect with existing mixed breed dog article. riffic (talk) 03:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect term to Mixed-breed dog. Chiton magnificus (talk) 08:06, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect term to Mixed-breed dog. Keetanii (talk) 08:11, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.