The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Qayderta Hadiile Dhuub[edit]

Qayderta Hadiile Dhuub (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Somali "locality". Mangoe (talk) 00:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 07:32, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 07:43, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, no, it's not that reliable a source, as has been proven over and over again. It is not good enough to establish that a place exists on its own. But second, the issue in this case is notability, and by our standards, something it describes only as a "locality", with no other information, is not notable. "Locality", in their terminology, means a place or area which isn't defined by habitation. Our standards are not so low as to accept every word on a map as notable, and that's all that this amounts to: a word on a map. Mangoe (talk) 10:07, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.