The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Jenks24 (talk) 06:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

QClash[edit]

QClash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is non-notable, has no independent sources, fails WP:GNG, WP:NRIVALRY and WP:EVENT. Macktheknifeau (talk) 18:14, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Reasoning: This article has 9 references. 2 aren't references. The 7 remaining are from the AFL or the clubs involved and are not independent reliable sources. This is a regular season fixture that just happens to have two teams from the same state. It fails WP:GNG and WP:EVENT and should be deleted. Macktheknifeau (talk) 18:14, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep this is a clearly notable event that has been WP:POINTily nominated along with a bunch of other AFL rivalry games in retaliation to a not yet played association football game being deleted - Sydney Derby (A-League)- The-Pope (talk) 01:05, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Moondyne (talk) 01:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - the article currently fails WP:NRIVALRY as it does not demonstrate how the rivalry is important. It does not currently show evidence of meeting WP:GNG as almost all of the references are not independent. Hack (talk) 01:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.