The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pyrcx[edit]

Originally tagged as speedy spam. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. The article was created by the programmer himself. Other than the fact that Pyrcx is already mentioned in IRCX, I cannot find any independent sources that can establish the software's notability, other than download locations for the client. JRHorse 01:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable IRC software. EliminatorJR ^Talk 01:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the website for discussing pyrcx's development is located at www.pyrcx.com, chrisjw/cyborg is the original programmer for the software

just because you havent heard of pyrcx doesnt mean it doesnt exist, and it isnt just a simple spam for an irc server. on top of that, pyrcx is more than just another ircx server

- To note, just because it exists is not a qualifier to be included on Wikipedia. JRHorse (below) gives some links that will provide what we are looking for. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the way the admin are around here im surprised anything with a link ever gets posted [xsu|c|desn0wmanx - former pyrcx developer] The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.162.35.14 (talk) 02:31, 11 April 2007

- Comment - "pyrcx is more than just another ircx server" is one point of view, whereas Wikipedia's point of view must be neutral. In any case, are there any reliable sources that justify pyrcx's notability, besides its own website? See Wikipedia's guideline on reliable sources and the official policy on Notability and Verifiability. JRHorse 03:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, on account that we are not sourceforge or freshmeat. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - corrected my own sigs. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no assertion of notability is made in the article. There are also conflict of interest issues as well. According to the talk page, the developer created the article. Also, the article appears to be nothing more than spam. --Cyrus Andiron 12:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Advert. Fail WP:SOFT, WP:WEB. Also, WP:COI. ffm ✎talk 13:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a notable IRC client [1], no assertion of notability, possible WP:COI and per nom already mentioned in IRCX.--Dakota 19:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable and unsourced. ➪HiDrNick! 23:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.