The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Purdue AFROTC Detachment 220[edit]

Purdue AFROTC Detachment 220 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A Single AFROTC Detachment is not notable enough, and this article does not satisfy notability by itself. The content here is very similar to the main Air Force ROTC page. Mjf3719 (talk) 19:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete as copyright infringement (already tagged). When something is written in that type of style, try google! --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.