The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per CSD G11 by User:RHaworth. Non-admin closure. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 05:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pur3x[edit]

Pur3x (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This non-notable energy drink company has received no coverage in reliable sources. Additionally the only contributor may have a conflict of interest (see a post by "goextreme" to this site), and has been warned repeatedly for advertising on Wikipedia. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 06:30, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, NN MLM spam. Ronabop (talk) 08:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for all the above reasons. Haakon (talk) 10:09, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as spam. Tagged as spam. DarkAudit (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete under criterion G11. Dalekusa (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.