The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural Close. Page has already been speedily deleted under CSD:G5. (non-admin closure) Vanstrat ⁽⁽🗼⁾⁾ 16:06, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Publiseer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The appears to be a simple advertisement for a start-up publishing company. The plethora of references all appear to be advertisements or parroting of press release. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The references include strong third party reliable sources. The Nation Newspaper and Vanguard Newspaper are both leading national newspapers in Nigeria. --Adamk36 (talk) 00:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC) Refer to List of newspapers in Nigeria.--Adamk36 (talk) 05:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)— Adamk36 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep. Taking a look at https://www.google.com.ng/search?q=publiseer&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiJjbDIoLXXAhVLSRoKHcR9AxsQ_AUIDSgE&biw=1600&bih=794 We will understand that Techpoint.ng, Vanguard, Business Post Nigeria, The Nation Newspaper, Bulawayo24 News, and Disrupt Africa are all reliable and independent references.--Dominicstudent (talk) 00:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are a least two independent published interviews included as references.--Dominicstudent (talk) 01:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)— Dominicstudent (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. Reference bombing detected. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference bombing? Here are at least 8 reliable references linked to this article:

Techpoint.ng: https://techpoint.ng/2017/10/26/publiseer-profile/ (Techpoint is a leading technology news blog incorporated into Google News.)

Pulse.ng: http://www.pulse.ng/news/tech/publiseer-to-distribute-your-music-and-books-online-id7504700.html (Pulse.ng is so popular in Nigeria, it needs no introduction)

IT News Africa: http://www.itnewsafrica.com/2017/10/publiseer-to-help-nigerian-authors-and-artists-publish-their-work-for-free/ (IT News Africa is a leading technology news blog in South Africa)

The Nation Newspaper: http://thenationonlineng.net/twin-brothers-launch-platform-authors-artistes/ (The Nation is the second-widest read daily newspaper in Nigeria.)

Vanguard: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2017/11/twins-float-platform-authors-artists/ (Vanguard is the foremost daily newspapers in Nigeria).

Bulawayo News: http://bulawayo24.com/index-id-technology-sc-internet-byo-119669.html (Bulawayo is a leading news platform in South Africa. It is also incorporated into Google News)

Tech Moran: https://techmoran.com/twin-brothers-making-online-content-distribution-easy-startup/ (Tech Moran is the leading technology news blog in Kenya.)

Disrupt Africa: http://disrupt-africa.com/2017/09/nigerian-startup-publiseer-launches-digital-publishing-platform/ (Disrupt Africa is a leading technology blog in South Africa. It is also incorporated into Google News)

All these news references are independent and reliable. Check the content of each one of them. The articles are on Publiseer and not a mere mention.--Dominicstudent (talk) 23:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete misusing Wikipedia for advertising purposes. Small, newly created "company" which didn't meet WP:GNG in all ramifications talk less of WP:CORPDEPTH which its entire life is not long enough to reach that. All the references (Save The Nation, Vanguard and perhaps Pulse News) are unreliable blogs and ordinary websites. The reliable ones I singled out above, are "not" reporting about a company, they're only advertising the "arrival of new publishers for writers", we don't advertise on Wikipedia as they do. The tone and referencing bombing of the lead show another clear is the usual pattern of advertisers on Wikipedia. Legitimate article are created without even citation in lead, or at most 1 - 3suffices — Ammarpad (talk) 08:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The " history ", " reception " and "services" are another reasons to delete this article. In history, the author completely end up advertising recruitments, though they used wrong date. Service and Reception section need no more explanation. They are totally what Wikipedia is not. Overall this new company didn't live enough to meet WP:GNG, didn't have WP:SIGCOV except adverts, uses unreliable sources and is promotional — Ammarpad (talk) 09:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.