The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Projector Camera Systems[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources or any indication of notability. Deprodded by the page creator without any explanation. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I have added more information with citations, internal and external links and also included an image taken by me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barisunver (talk • contribs) 20:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Enough added sources to indicate notability is likely. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to have had major flaws addressed. Jeff Quinn (talk) 17:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.