The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nobody has attempted to refute the relevance of the sources added after the nomination. Sandstein 14:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Project 315[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With virtually no inline citations, this article makes a number of large and very sweeping claims that are hard to verify - particularly as the citation and sourcing styles are obfuscatory. Three interviews (Jerusalem Post, Maariv and Israel Today) in mainstream media and a lot of incidental mentions in incidental media are presented as references but they're not enough for notability to be established for what is clearly a partisan PR exercise that simply doesn't belong in this unverified and unverifiable state on Wikipedia. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Israel. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Over 40 refs in the Hebrew article appear to be worthy of review and consideration. 2603:7000:2143:8500:29DB:DC1E:C88D:ABB7 (talk) 08:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of citations and external links, including 2 articles in English, for the non Hebrew reading people. The project has become very prominent in Israel. Their members are constantly being interviewed by main media, including print, radio and television, such as Channel 14 (Israel). They appear regularly in Kinneret Barashi's "Uplan Patuach". The project itself has made an impact on the trןal and their findings were given to the defence attorneys.Ofir michael (talk) 22:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:04, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just added 3 more sources in English which proves notability. One on them is from Haaretz written by Gadi Taub.Ofir michael (talk) 05:51, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Per ample sources there is absolutely no notability concern. The only problem I have with this article is that it is still an orphan. Ofir Michael, maybe you can also integrate it into other articles? gidonb (talk) 01:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll just connect it to Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu.Ofir michael (talk) 05:13, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Article has significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and easily meets WP:GNG. The fact that the sources are not used inline is not a reason for deletion; deletion is not cleanup. Does the article need improvement? Absolutely. Is deletion the answer? Absolutely not. - Aoidh (talk) 06:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.