The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - as hoax. --Haemo 20:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Principality of Estland[edit]

I am preserving this at my user page if anyone wishes to view the content in future- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JJJ999JJJ999 03:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Principality of Estland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

hoax Such state never existed, the article contains random statements from the era of Livonian War.--Termer 10:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Well, it's taken a while to clean up all this brilliant nonsense the guy has created and nobody knows how much is left of it. He/she should also get the first prize for sockpuppetry on WP :User:Tuulispask AKA User:Casesoccur [1] more than 10 accounts. --Termer 10:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Ugaunia has it's problems but it was an ancient county once, please see google books, the title is OK [2]--Termer 11:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The people were real, the titles were nominal given by Ivan IV during Livonian War. The articles should be renamed and rewritten: "Magnus of Livonia" was known as Duke Magnus of Holstein. And the only one who was calling Maria a Queen was Magnus himself perhaps and Ivan IV. --Termer 11:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As an aside, there is going to need to be a LOT of clean-up after this mess. This "Estland" bullshit seems to have leaked into other articles on REAL people and topics, such as: Magnus of Livonia, Bishopric of Reval, Livonia, Swedish Estonia, Duchy of Courland and Semigallia, hell there are probably many more, I got tired of searching for them. This link may help: [3]. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's not so bad, it was just the ones you mention and a couple of others, half a dozen all in all. I've delinked anything from mainspace now [4]--victor falk 09:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sackalia is ancient Sakala county, Ugaunia is Ugandi county. Both articles should be moved and kept, ie resp. Sakala (county) and Ugandi. I will move the latter. -- Sander Säde 03:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Admin help is needed with moving Ugandi. It seems that Bloomfeld's socks have been busy with that redirect as well. -- Sander Säde 03:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I took care of it--Termer 05:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What should be done about Ugaunians? Move to Ugalased? -- Sander Säde 06:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Sander Säde Re: @ Talk:Ugaunians--Termer 06:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'd slow down with this. It wasn't a country but it was an attempt to establish a formally independent Duchy by the Baltic Germans during the German Occupation of Estonia and Latvia in 1918. --Termer 08:11, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're thinking of the United Baltic Duchy aren't you? --victor falk 11:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
victor falk, correct, thats what I was talking about. The redirect from Baltic State should go to Baltic States instead perhaps.--Termer 15:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thats a very good idea. Ive done exactly that.--Alexia Death the Grey 16:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's exactly what seems to be wrong with these articles and is making cleanup so hard. There is a root of truth in them, but the presentation is anything but valid. This duchy is hardly a short lived country... It needs to be corrected. And the redirect deleted...--Alexia Death the Grey 10:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, perhaps we should something like The AfD Hoax Trophy Gallery...--victor falk 23:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.