The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 14:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poojah[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is about an individual famous for one event only, an internet forum post (though there has been a second post receiving some interest on the web). The assertions of notability are based upon news reports of this single post and the honour of being linked from a variety of football websites. Not notable for more than one event, which in itself was barely more than a few small news reports. It is unlikely that this article could be expanded into a quality encyclopaedic article. Pretty Green (talk) 11:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Pretty Green (talk) 11:48, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as classic example of WP:BLP1E. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above then recreate as a redirect to Pooja (this article actually being a double-redirect in its original form) as it is a plausible search term for either the forms of worship or the name. Keresaspa (talk) 17:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - barely famous for one event? No thank you! Giant Snowman 20:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:BLP1E. This person is notable for one event only. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - If it's "classic BLP1E", then the solution is to rename the article appropriately, not to delete. Despite the references to two major publications, it is admittedly a barely notable event. It probably doesn't need an article, and Pretty Green is right that it is unlikely it could be expanded into a quality article. However, I have this horrible gnawing feeling every time I come across "Delete for BLP1E!" repeated over and over again in an AfD, when the solution for the 1E concern is to rename/move... so my comment squeeks out from my fingertips anyway. - BalthCat (talk) 04:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hardly notable. ῤerspeκὖlὖm^{in ænigmate} ^{( talk )} 01:08, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A BLP1E where the event isn't notable either. Alzarian16 (talk) 09:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - neither the event nor the specific person behind it is notable -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.