The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 05:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pollutarian[edit]

Pollutarian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Based on google hits searching for either the term itself or its creator, this appears to be an obviously non-notable neologism. I'm pre-emptively suggesting this be snowball deleted. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I googled it, and the only definition I can see is "a person who eats veg and chicken" Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:58, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Pollotarianism. The claim about the origins of this term made in the present article are almost certainly false. AlexTiefling (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete neologism which gets 3 (count em) ex-WP ghits [1] Do not redirect to unrelated but similar sounding term. Consider WP:SNOW to put the creator out of his evident misery. Also consider Speedy delete G3 as there is a "Pig Dog Press" but it has no evident connection with any chris boyd and the book title only ghits WP. Rd232 ^talk 20:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.