The result was keep. Article has been improved a lot after the deletion nomination (specially the history section). More importantly, there is not any "delete" vote, and consensus seems to be in favour of keeping the article. (non-admin closure) Tito☸Dutta 23:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incoherent article describing a few incidents where people talked of pogonophobia, instead of defining it with proper sources. As it stands, it's mostly a dictionary definition, which would fit better on Wiktionary. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]