The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 13:08, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pmdtechnologies[edit]

Pmdtechnologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

You can see the original before my trimming of primary sources here. The remaining are blogs, broken links and junk sources. Out of the sources provided on Talk this one looks usable, but none other do. Appears to be a routine company of only 70 employees. CorporateM (Talk) 04:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Tentative delete - Although I'm not a German speaker so I'll wait for others to comment, my searches found nothing particularly good with the best being this and this. Unless someone else can improve this, I'm then opening to draft/userfy the article. SwisterTwister talk 18:31, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Probable Keep pending a complete overhaul, otherwise the move to userspace is a good call. This article from FAZ seems reliable, independent and non-trival coverage; still unsure about whether some of the articles from major websites listed on the talk page are notable or not, but the COI editor seems willing to work constructively within our guidlines so I'm willing to help make sure it's up to WP standards (and not advertising!). ‑‑mjgilson^T 15:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep. Besides the prestigious nomination and the awards, Pmdtechnologies provides TOF-technology for the new generation 3D tablets and mobile phones which are the result of Google’s Project Tango – that alone should qualify for a keep. Cf. Canesta. 87.182.97.187 (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep- From a simple Google search, I can find several reliable references that have minor and major mentions of Pmdtechnologies.Ireneshih (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.