Playground 52

Playground 52 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Serious lack of notability. It's a playground. And that's all the text says about it. Probably speediable, but thought I'd give it the benefit of the doubt just in case there's something worth keeping about it. Grutness...wha? 09:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep (full confessions: I created this stub). There's no doubt that this is not the most important park in the Bronx, nor the most exciting article. That said, the park is notable enough to get an article about it in the NY Times (cited in the article), mention on some music website (http://www.reverbnation.com/venue/808514), an arts website (http://www.placematters.net/node/976) and a few checkins on foursquare (https://foursquare.com/venue/18591302). I think that (just barely) meets Wikipedia:N#General_notability_guideline. Might make sense to rename this to be 52 Park. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • OK - I'll do you a deal :) As it stands it looks completely non-notable, and if it stays that way it would be deletable. - but if you can add something to the article to make it look notable, I'll withdraw the nom. Grutness...wha? 00:51, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]