The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ceuta. Daniel (talk) 00:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Playa del Sarchal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small generic beach with no explanation of notability, fails WP:GEOLAND. Prod removed without explanation as usual. Reywas92^Talk 19:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 19:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 19:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not every named place is notable, that is what we would need to consider making something notable to have this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect or merge to Ceuta per WP:SIGCOV and WP:CHEAP. It's sourced, and people might be looking for this little beach, but not so notable that anyone has written about it in a significant way. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tramaguera. Bearian (talk) 16:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect: As with the other similar noms, I can't find anything other than mentions in tourism sites, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. Per GEOLAND, "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc. The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography." I don't see any reason not to redirect it to Ceuta, but I don't think there is anything to merge.  // Timothy :: talk  08:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.