The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Little more than a blurb created by the founder in order to drive hits to their website. No independent coverage, fails WP:NWEB. QueenCake (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – per nom. Practically an advert. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of independent coverage to demonstrate notability. TheBlueCanoe 17:33, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I did like the page, but it's down now most times anyway... Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.