The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 01:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pivotlog[edit]

expired uncontested prod, but this article has been around awhile with many editors so it should be afd'ed not prod'ed. Prod tag was WP:N and WP:V, which about sums up the article. Carlossuarez46 23:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn. KTC 03:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- KTC 03:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For the same reasons as those for which I proded it. On a side note, which policy says that PROD should not be used on an article with many editors ? I couldn't find it. I notice that the last batch of CMS software I proded were deleted by User:Riana, regardless of whether or not they were old I think. Are you sure policy states that PROD can only be used on new articles or with few contributions, I thought that would only have been for speedy deletion tags that it was the case ? I was thinking that if there were many editors, then there would be many people ready to contest the PROD. Thank you though for forcing people to discuss the article, because it does seem a bit strange when I PROD an article and nobody has any opinion of it on the article talk page. Jackaranga 14:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.