The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 05:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pilar Pili (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

non-notable artist. Association with notable people doesn't convey notability. No sources, search of google news back to 1920s [1] so no hits (I know that doesn't count though), and a very strong point of view (again I know that doesn't count) Mbisanz (talk) 10:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for checking Google News -- so many nominators overlook this. I think this article is mis-titled but I'm reluctant to mess with it during the AfD. There maybe coverage under an alternate name. --A. B. ^(talk) 16:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find a better name to redirect it to, please feel free to let me know. I don't know Spanish, so a google web search is of no help in trying to figure out if we already have coverage. Mbisanz (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

e/c*Delete. With assertions like these, I would think something would come up in google archives. (I did my own extensive searches independent of nominator - did not use links provided, and got same nada result). Other problems I see: Pilar is a female (Spanish) name. No instances of it ever being used as a unisex name or male name that I've been able to document. 2. Pili is a pet name for Pilar (think Anthony - Tony, or Michael - Mikey). It is not a surname (therefore having an article titled Pilar Pili (unless proven that that is how "he" signed his name artistically.). If in fact Pilar Pili is a real person, survives notability, and consensus says keep, the article needs to be renamed. Also, I would love to know where these rather bold assertions came from, where's the source? Keeper | 76 16:32, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very useful background, thanks Mbisanz (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Keeper76 -- thanks for your help. --A. B. ^(talk)
• Delete, per Keeper76 (talk · contribs), and lack of sources/WP:OR. Cirt (talk) 17:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 21:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Keeper76. If there were sources in Spanish, I would be able to read them at least in part, but I can't find any myself. Furthermore, the article doesn't make much sense politically -- why would Raul Castro attend the funeral of a Batista supporter? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Clubmarx (talk) 17:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.