The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted as G3 by User:Primefac on 08:32, 2 February 2017 (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PikoTarism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google search didn't find any hits on PikoTarism. This may be a hoax, but in any case it isn't notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject has no coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An obvious hoax article, based on a video from a comedian. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 20:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete as per above. J 947 04:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not much seems to have been written about it. Wikipedia is not the first place to write about it. Zombalu (talk) 11:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sock !vote above has been struck. Lepricavark (talk) 19:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very Strong Delete, obvious hoax. 92.72.204.75 (talk) 20:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Obvious hoax and INVENTION that ~~frankly I'm surprised made it past the NPP guard dogs. Those homies are slackin' lately.~~ L3X1 My Complaint Desk 22:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - User:L3X1 - This didn't make it past NPP. I tagged it for AFD from NPP. I considered it a non-obvious hoax. If someone else considers it an obvious hoax, they can tag it for G3. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for wording then, did not mean to sound mean or ungrateful. I added a G3 using Twinkle. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 13:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - No problem. We shall see if it gets speedied or if the AFD continues to run. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:42, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.