The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 23:20, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pika software builder[edit]

Pika software builder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks coverage in 3rd party sources, does not meet notability guidelines Supplied references are primary sources or simple download links. PROD was contested without explanation. Muhandes (talk) 10:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete 17 sources cited, 16 are of the subjects website, the last is the download page from download.cnet.com. Per nom. Dennis Brown (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per dennis Pass a Method talk 11:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - just no 3rd pary coverage. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lacks coverage in 3rd party sources, bordering on spam RadioFan (talk) 03:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 18:53, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.