The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Unambiguous unsourced advertising. L Faraone 17:33, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Philips MCD395[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not notable at all, the article is bare, and it looks like it may be written by a Philips employee or something! This product is not even sold anymore, and was never very popular One Of Seven Billion (talk) 07:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:53, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of importance, and a search doesn't find evidence of notability. Peter James (talk) 17:13, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 17:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - for the reasons above. Uberaccount (talk) 19:49, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.