The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Shihad. A strict !vote count would indicate delete, but I note that the nominator also said redirect and Beam says delete if the information is in the main band article. That indicates that 3 of the 4 editors who commented would be happy with a merge/redirect, and only two with a delete (as the information is not yet in the band page, I assume Beam does not want a delete at this time.) Merging certainly follows policy, so merge it is. Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Knight (musician)[edit]

Phil Knight (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Articles on musicians require them to be known for something other than a single artist/band, which this musician does not fulfill. Delete and redirect to the band page. Ironho lds 22:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC or WP:BIO.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 23:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge/Delete Not notable. —  BQZip01  —  ^talk 05:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Delete it as long as the information is within a sub section in the band article. Beam 19:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.