The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Heckels[edit]

Phil Heckels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of an artist that does not meet WP:CREATIVE. Mccapra (talk) 07:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete apparently he gained some media coverage for, quote, "drawing 'rubbish' portraits of people's pets", which apparently started out as a joke. If he gains more attention down the line for said pet portraits, he will be eligible for an article. But not now.--- Possibly (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. This topic might be noteworthy if there is another piece of significant coverage in a credible third-party source. I'd support moving the article to Draft space to give editors an opportunity to improve it to meet Notability.--Greysonsarch (talk) 14:45, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.