The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Petscop[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: User:Kvng contested the PROD, but I still feel that this article, at least with the current level of coverage in reliable sources, fails the GNG and WP:1DAY. Besides the one New Yorker article, the other two references Kvng cited are low quality clickbait websites. Besides the notability issue, the article as it stands is extremely low quality and contained in large part content I believe to be a copyright violation (I removed it). Psiĥedelisto (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 06:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I feel like it's on the brink of being notable, but as a probable hoax we should set the bar a bit higher than 3 mentions in online news articles. If it continues to get more attention you could probably call it notable. Kotaku might have clickbait but it's still a reliable source. Still, don't want to give the impression that if you make something weird enough to get picked up by Kotaku you automatically get an article._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kotaku, Gamepro, Destructoid. This is at least a weak delete from me. --Izno (talk) 12:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- The author's own words make the case: unfinished, only content, fictional, and presumably. Rhadow (talk) 17:32, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.