The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:08, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Cluskey[edit]

Peter Cluskey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD of a journalist/poet. A few of his poems have been published, but I can't find evidence that he has won any awards or is widely cited. I can't find anything demonstrating notability via a Google search. I believe he fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:BIO in general. There was also a discussion at the COI noticeboard about this article. PDCook (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Chutznik (talk) 19:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —PDCook (talk) 15:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Does not meet the criteria of WP:ENT, which includes opinion makers and television personalities. As a reporter/journalist, he has not made a "unique, prolific or innovative contribution" and there is no evidence of a "fan base". In my opinion, WP:ENT is not ideal for journalism, but, nonetheless, just doing ones job - albeit in the public eye - is not enough to make someone notable. Cluskey is not widely cited or referred to by other independent sources, which is a strong indicator of non-notability. He has not, as far as I can tell, won any notable awards or been recognised by his peers or profession as being notable. All this leads me to conclude he is not notable as a journalist or opinion maker. Wikipeterproject (talk) 23:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.